Which works best for cellulite: radiofrequency, ultrasound cavitation, cellulite-specific massage or mesotherapy?
What works for cellulite
The most effective options for cellulite reduction are high-power ultrasound cavitation treatment, high-power monopolar radiofrequency treatment, no-needle mesotherapy treatment (if a highly concentrated gel with several active ongredients is used) and vigorous cellulite-specific massage. Low intensity ultrasound, low intensity RF, bipolar RF, mesotherapy is diluted commercial gels and literally any other technique, are not worth bothering about, as they are either ineffective, inefficient or intrusive.
Examples of such methods comprise low level laser therapy (LLLT), infrared LED, mechanical massage (such as vacuum suction/palper-rouler or vibration massage/G5), any other massage technique (including the old-fashioned manual lymphatic drainage massage), injection-based mesotherapy, acoustic wave therapy and other gimmicks.
Fortunately for you, we have tried/assessed almost every cellulite treatment available today (so you don't have to) and concluded that only three things work, offer good value for money and are not intrusive/nasty to your health.
The choice is between three techniques: strong cellulite-specific massage, high-power ultrasound cavitation and high-power, cooled, monopolar radiofrequency
Intensive cellulite-specific massage (ICSM) works on all aspects of cellulite naturally and gradually, and offers great value for money. However, ICSM is a bit slow for some people's liking.
On the other hand high-power radiofrequency does work fast, but only if it is "monopolar" (as opposed to bipolar or multipolar), if it is "resistive" (as opposed to capacitive) and if the equipment used offers a cooling option (essential for safe, effective RF treatment). High-power ultrasound also works fast. The only problem with these techniques is that they are typically more expensive than ICSM, and they do not offer good value for money/time as stand-alone procedures.
A good solution is to simultaneously combine both radiofrequency and cavitation (a small number of machines allow such functionality) so that you can benefit from both technologies at the same cost. However, this only makes sense if the clinic does not charge you more for the combined treatment.
Furthermore, both ultrasound and radiofrequency exert a needle-free mesotherapy effect on the skin (they help boost absorption of active ingredients by the skin). Therefore, by applying one or both of those techniques with a good anti-cellulite gel/cream you can benefit from the mesotherapy effect at no extra cost. Again, this only makes sense f the clinic uses a highly concentrated product and if they do not charge you extra for mesotherapy.
Needle-free mesotherapy does not make any sense at all as a stand-alone treatment, as it is not effective enough on it's own to justify the typically high cost charged for this technique. However, seen as an extra bonus of your RF and/or ultrasound treatment, no-needle mesotherapy makes perfect sense, provided that you are not charged additionally (or at least not too much).
So, in summary, we could say that the simultaneous application of a good RF treatment with a good ultrasound cavitation treatment makes perfect sense in terms of effectiveness and value for money and time. On the other hand, those treatments taken separately may be effective but they don't offer good value for time and money.
However, now the following question arises: what is better, cellulite-specific massage or simultaneous cavitation/radiofrequency/mesotherapy?
Intensive, cellulite-specific massage (ICSM)
Vigorous cellulite-specific massage is very effective for lymphatic drainage, blood circulation and detoxification, at is generally available a lower cost than SCRM. Cellulite-specific massage also boosts firmness and helps with cellulite fat loss, but not as impressively and not nearly ad fast as simultaneous cavitation, mesotherapy and radiofrequency. Therefore, it becomes apparent that vigorous cellulite-specific massage is ideal is speed of results is not a consideration and if you want cellulite reduction at a low cost, with emphasis on circulation enhancement and detoxification.
Simultaneous cavitation, radiofrequency and mesotherapy (SCRM)
The right cavitation, radiofrequency and mesotherapy treatment is more effective for skin tightening, for cellulite fat reduction and for overall faster results in one specific area, as we analysed in our dedicated radiofrequency/cavitation article. It also boosts circulation, but not as effectively as intensive cellulite massage does. On the other hand, SCRM is more expensive than intensive cellulite massage. Therefore, it becomes apparent that simultaneous mesotherapy, cavitation and radiofrequency is ideal if price is not a problem and if your main consideration for a cellulite treatment is fast and impressive cellulite reduction with emphasis on fast skin firming/lifting.













