“I have been researching and trying different natural and artificial sweeteners for decades now, trying to satisfy my sweet tooth in a healthy, non fattening way and after all this time I can report that there is no good sweetener - natural or unnatural, including sugar in all its guises, from honey to agave syrup to molasses etc. The research papers presented here is one of the many that confirm and explain this position. The solution to sugar is not to find an ideal non fattening sugar, the solution is to detoxify from the sweet taste altogether.”
Sweet lies: how the sweetener sucralose tricks your brain and increases hunger - and consequently weight gain and cellulite
Sucralose, sugar and weight gain | In summary
Sucralose vs. sucrose (sugar)
How sucralose affects hypothalamic blood flow vs. sugar
Body weight impact on hypothalamic response to sucralose
Blood glucose and hunger: sucrose vs. sucralose effects
Sucralose and brain connectivity: hypothalamus insights
Why sucralose might increase hunger via hypothalamus and consequently lead to weight gain
Non-caloric sweeteners, weight management and dieting
Sucralose, hypothalamus, and weight control takeaways
Sucralose could make cellulite worse
Non-caloric sweetener effects on brain appetite regulation in individuals across varying body weights
Have a skin tightening/cellulite treatment with London’s cellulite experts
Advanced, infrared / blue / red light therapy treatments in London at LipoTherapeia
The Cellulite School™: Get advanced training in cellulite reduction and skin tightening
Sucralose, sugar and weight gain | In summary
A study has investigated how the artificial sweetener sucralose affects appetite and brain activity compared to sucrose and water. Seventy-five young adults aged 18–35, divided into healthy weight, overweight, and obese groups, consumed three drinks on different days: one containing sucrose, one with sucralose of equivalent sweetness, and one with water. Their hunger levels, blood glucose, and brain activity were measured using MRI scans focused on the hypothalamus, which regulates hunger.
The findings showed that sucralose increased blood flow to the hypothalamus more than sucrose or water, especially in the lateral hypothalamus, associated with hunger. This effect was most pronounced in overweight individuals. In healthy weight participants, sucralose triggered a stronger reaction than sucrose, while in obese participants, the difference was clearest between sucralose and water.
Sucrose raised blood glucose, which reduced hunger and decreased hypothalamic activity linked to satiety. Sucralose, however, did not increase blood glucose, leaving participants hungrier than after sucrose, though hunger levels were similar to water. Additionally, sucralose strengthened hypothalamic connectivity with brain areas related to motivation and sensory processing, which could heighten food cravings.
These results suggest that sucralose may confuse the brain’s hunger control system, leading to increased appetite, particularly in those overweight or obese. Indirectly, this could contribute to overeating, weight gain, and worsening of cellulite, though controlled intake might prevent fat accumulation.
Sucralose vs. sucrose (sugar)
In recent years, many people have turned to non-caloric sweeteners like sucralose to enjoy sweet tastes without adding calories to their diet.
These sweeteners are popular for weight management, but there’s growing debate about whether they might actually affect hunger and health in unexpected ways. This study explores how sucralose impacts the brain’s appetite control compared to regular sugar (sucrose) and water.
The research focuses on a part of the brain called the hypothalamus, which helps regulate hunger, and examines how it reacts differently in people with varying body weights - healthy weight, overweight, and obese - and how it can indirectly affect cellulite.
How sucralose affects hypothalamic blood flow vs. sugar
The researchers wanted to see how the brain responds to sweetness with and without calories. They chose sucralose, a non-caloric sweetener that tastes sweet but provides no energy, and compared it to sucrose, which is regular sugar with calories, and plain water.
The study involved 75 young adults aged 18-35, split into three groups based on their body mass index (BMI): healthy weight, overweight, and obese. Each participant drank three different drinks on separate days: one with 75 grams of sucrose, one with sucralose (matched to taste as sweet as the sucrose drink), and one with just water.
The order was random, and participants didn’t know which drink they were getting each time.
Body weight impact on hypothalamic response to sucralose
To study the brain’s reaction, the researchers used a specific type of MRI called arterial spin labelling (ASL), to measure blood flow in the hypothalamus.
More blood flow can mean more activity in that brain area, often linked to hunger. They also checked blood glucose levels and asked participants to rate their hunger before and after drinking.
Blood glucose and hunger: sucrose vs. sucralose effects
The study found that after drinking sucralose, there was a bigger increase in hypothalamic blood flow compared to both sucrose and water. This was especially strong in the lateral hypothalamus, a part tied to feeling hungry.
Sucralose seemed to “wake up” the hunger centre more than sugar or plain water - especially in the overweight people.
Sucralose and brain connectivity: hypothalamus insights
For people with healthy weight, the hypothalamus showed a bigger reaction to sucralose compared to sucrose
For people with obesity, the reaction was stronger when comparing sucralose to water
This suggests that overweight and obese people react to sucralose with even more hunger than people with normal body weight.
Why sucralose might increase hunger via hypothalamus and consequently lead to weight gain
Drinking sucrose raised blood glucose levels, which lowered hunger and reduced blood flow in the medial hypothalamus, a part linked to feeling full.
Sucralose, however, didn’t raise blood glucose and made people feel hungrier than sucrose did, though hunger was about the same as after water. Basically, sugar gave energy and calmed hunger, while sucralose didn’t.
Sucralose also increased functional connectivity - how the hypothalamus “talks” to other brain areas - compared to sucrose and water. It linked more with regions involved in motivation (like wanting food) and sensory processing (like tasting or sensing food), which might make people crave food more.
Non-caloric sweeteners, weight management and dieting
Imagine your hypothalamus as a hunger control centre in your brain. When you eat something sweet with calories, like sucrose, your body gets energy, and the brain says, “Okay, I’m satisfied,” calming hunger.
But with sucralose, it’s like pressing a “sweet” button without giving the energy your brain expects. This might confuse the hypothalamus, making it more active and possibly increasing hunger.
The study suggests that non-caloric sweeteners could trick your brain into wanting more food, rather than less. The differences by body weight are interesting too.
People with healthy weight showed a stronger brain reaction when sucralose was compared to sucrose, while obese individuals reacted more when it was compared to water.
This hints that how your brain responds to sucralose might depend on your body size, which could affect weight control strategies.
Sucralose, hypothalamus, and weight control takeaways
This study shows that sucralose, a non-caloric sweetener, affects the hypothalamus - and hunger - differently than sucrose or water. It increases brain activity linked to hunger, doesn’t raise blood glucose, and might make you feel hungrier than sugar does.
These effects vary depending on whether you’re healthy weight, overweight, or obese, suggesting personal factors matter.
Sucralose could make cellulite worse
Sucralose’s impact on cellulite isn’t directly studied, but this research offers clues.
Unlike sucrose, sucralose doesn’t raise blood glucose or satisfy hunger, instead boosting hypothalamic activity and appetite. This could lead to overeating, potentially increasing fat stores and worsening cellulite’s appearance over time.
However, its zero-calorie nature might keep fat gain neutral if intake stays controlled, leaving cellulite unchanged.
Overall, sucralose and other sweeteners might make cellulite worse indirectly by driving hunger - and they definitely do not help reduce or prevent cellulite.
Non-caloric sweetener effects on brain appetite regulation in individuals across varying body weights
Research paper link: https://www.nature.com/articles/s42255-025-01227-8
Abstract: Sucralose, a widely used non-caloric sweetener, provides sweet taste without calories. Some studies suggest that non-caloric sweeteners stimulate appetite, possibly owing to the delivery of a sweet taste without the post-ingestive metabolic signals that normally communicate with the hypothalamus to suppress hunger. In a randomized crossover trial 75 young adults (healthy weight, overweight or with obesity) consumed a drink containing sucralose, sweetness-matched sucrose or water. We show that acute consumption of sucralose versus sucrose stimulates hypothalamic blood flow (P < 0.018) and greater hunger responses (P < 0.001). Sucralose versus water also increases hypothalamic blood flow (P < 0.019) but produces no difference in hunger ratings. Sucrose, but not sucralose, increases peripheral glucose levels, which are associated with reductions in medial hypothalamic blood flow (P < 0.007). Sucralose, compared to sucrose and water, results in increased functional connections between the hypothalamus and brain regions involved in motivation and somatosensory processing. These findings suggest that non-caloric sweeteners could affect key mechanisms in the hypothalamus responsible for appetite regulation.
Have a treatment in London with the cellulite experts
At LipoTherapeia we have specialised 100% in skin tightening and cellulite reduction for more than two decades and 20,000+ sessions.
This is all we study and practise every day and have researched and tried hands-on all the important skin tightening equipment and their manufacturers.
As strong, deep acting radiofrequency and deep-acting, high-power ultrasound cavitation are the technologies of choice for skin tightening and cellulite reduction, we have invested in the best RF/ultrasound technologies in the world.
(Of course, we keep looking for new technologies every day and if/when a better technology materialises we will be the first to provide it. However, we will never follow the latest ineffective gimmick, just because it’s good marketing to offer the latest hyped up - yet ineffective and/or unsafe treatment.)
Furthermore, over the last two decades we have developed advanced RF and cavitation treatment protocols in order to make the most of our technologies, for maximum results, naturally and safely.
And for even better, faster results, we now combine our RF/ultrasound treatments with high-power red/infrared light LED treatment.
Our radiofrequency/ultrasound/LED treatments are comfortable, pain-free, downtime-free, injection-free, 99.5%+ safe and always non-invasive.
(No unsafe and ineffective RF microneedling or HIFU and no safe but ineffective acoustic wave therapy, superficial RF (bipolar/tripolar/multipolar etc), low power RF/cavitation, electrical muscle stimulation, lymphatic massage, cupping, dry brushing and no ridiculous bum bum creams.)
Our focus is on honest, realistic, science-based treatment, combined with caring, professional service, with a smile.
We will be pleased to see you, assess your cellulite, skin laxity or fibrosis, listen to your story, discuss your case and offer you the best possible treatment.
The Cellulite School™: Get advanced training in cellulite reduction and skin tightening
Why train with The Cellulite School™?
We all know that training in cellulite reduction and skin tightening is as basic as it gets. It is typically a 4-6 hour training, involving only basic instruction from the manufacturer on how operators can use the machine; lots of myths, erroneous information and misconceptions; and some basic health and safety on how to use the machine.
There is no proper, real training in the science or cellulite, skin tightening, radiofrequency, ultrasound and all related technologies is non-existent - worldwide.
Do you want to deeply understand radiofrequency, ultrasound cavitation, LED phototherapy, cellulite and skin tightening?
Get proper training based on 25-year theory and practical application of cellulite reduction and valuable insights from 24,000+ sessions and 4,200+ clients.
Now you can get instant access to our expertise and save yourself literally thousands of pounds, dollars or euros of expensive mistakes and thousands of hours of study, research and practical application by attending one of our half-day, 1-day, 2-day or 3-day professional consultancy / training courses.
Understand deeply - and get properly trained in - the science of radiofrequency, ultrasound cavitation, LED phototherapy, cellulite and skin tightening and confidently offer your clients the safest, strongest and most effective treatment possible.
Service available via Zoom or at our central London practice.
Learn more or check prices and book training at our London clinic or via Zoom.