Cellulite BEFORE and AFTER pictures


The effectiveness of our treatments is clearly reflected in our 100% genuine "before and after" photos displayed below.

In contrast to the usual fake "before and after" photos found on most websites, all of our "before and after" pictures are:

100% unretouched
(no Photoshop manipulation)

Taken with identical lighting both "before" and "after" to offer accurate proof of treatment effectiveness
(no misleading lighting manipulation, such as changing room spotlights before and full frontal flash light after)

Of our own clients treated at our own clinic by the same specialists who will treat you
(no pictures provided by the manufacturers, of clients treated at some clinic somewhere in the world...)

Using our own exclusive technology, treatment protocols and treatment products that will be used for your treatment too
(same advanced technology, expert treatment protocols, concentrated treatment formulations and expert therapist)



Please note that our "before and after" cellulite treatment pictures were taken in 2011 with the previous version of the Meso-CRF® equipment, formulations and treatment protocols of that time. With the vastly more advanced treatment protocols, equipment and natural actives we use today, results are even more impressive.

Also, you may note that the results do not only include cellulite reduction, but also skin lifting / tightening, thigh gap reduction and local fat reduction :)



All photos: © LipoTherapeia Ltd 2011. All rights reserved. No photos can be reproduced without written permission. Please note that, as with any treatment or body product, results vary from person to person.





Unfortunately, most before and after cellulite pictures are fake

The sad truth is that the vast majority of "before & after" photos found on most websites and used by most salons and clinics are simply fake, aiming to take advantage of the public's ignorance. Specifically, most so-called "before and after" pictures are either:

Taken with harsh lighting "before" and flattering lighting "after"

This is as misleading for the consumer as retouching. Again, beware: if you see photos too good to be true on a website, ask if they can confirm in writing that their photos are taken with identical lighting "before and after". Or simply ask an experienced photographer to have a look at the photos - they can immediately tell the difference (click on the photo below for a hi-res example of lighting manipulation.

Heavily retouched on Photoshop to remove the cellulite on the "after" photos

The use of retouching on celebrity photos may be unethical, but the use of retouched "before and after" photos by salons is actually fraud. So if you see photos too good to be true on a website ask if they can confirm in writing that their photos are not retouched.

Provided by the equipment manufacturer, i.e. photos are not of clients treated at the clinic/salon in question

Treatment quality varies widely from clinic to clinic, even if the same equipment is used, so using manufacturer-provided photos means absolutely nothing about the expertise and results offered at a specific clinic



You can rest assured that we do not follow such misleading practices. All our photos are of clients that we have treated, at our own practice with our own exclusive treatment protocols and products, are completely unretouched and are taken with exactly the same lighting "before" and "after".

In fact, there were a few occasions when we found our photos stolen and adorning another clinics' website (yes, it does happen), hence the prominent copyright notice in the middle of our photos.

Finally, please note that despite using the most powerful anti-cellulite technology available today, we do not lie to our clients about results with only one, two or even three miracle sessions, as many clinics do. We prefer to be honest and keep our word.

In fact, in order to clearly show the difference, we intentionally used harsh lighting on these pictures, so cellulite on both the "before" and "after" photos looks more severe than it normally is (of course the light was identical before and after, for accuracy and honesty).